In the absence of the appellant and without any request for an accommodation, the High Court at Calcutta dismissed the first appeal and connected applications for default.
The appeal and connected applications are dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court At Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side
25.03.22 Sl-32 Ct.32 (S.R.)
F.A. No.230 of 2007 The Board of Trustee for the Port of Calcutta
v.
M/s. B.K. Engineering Works & Anr. with CAN No.1 of 2005 (Old No.7048 of 2005) (not found) with CAN No.6 of 2009 (Old No.2521 of 2009) (not found) and CAN No.7 of 2009 (Old No.3114 of 2009) (not found)
No one appears on behalf of the appellant and no accommodation has been sought for.
In view thereof, the appeal and the connected applications are dismissed for default.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
The Board of Trustee for the Port of Calcutta
M/s. B.K. Engineering Works & Anr.
Sugato Majumdar
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
