Appeal and recall cases allowed. Delay due to sub-judice revision is condoned; paper books to be filed; restoration of original file ordered. Hearing listed upon disposal of related revision.
Recall application allowed; delay condoned; FA No. 191 of 2017 restored to original file; paper books to be filed within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M/L.10. April 7, 2025. MNS.
FA No. 191 of 2017 + CAN 7 of 2022 + CAN 8 of 2022
Harekrishna Das and others Vs. Gokul Das and another
Mr. Partha Sarathi Das
…for the appellants.
Mr. Arup Banerjee
… for the respondents.
2
ought to await the outcome of the said revisional Apalication.
Re: FA No. 191 of 2017
3
which shall be deposited within a week from date, if not already deposited.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay is permissible given that the deposit of the decree amount is sub judice before the Revisional Court.
Harekrishna Das and others
Gokul Das and another
Uday Kumar
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
