Partly allowed

Ajgar Hossain @ Akram Miah and Ors. v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC23 Sept 2021CRM/557/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri allowed an application for anticipatory bail under s. 438 CrPC for three petitioners facing allegations under the IPC. Considering prima facie false implication due to political rivalry, the Court directed bail under restricted movement conditions, dismissing the application for the fourth petitioner as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail to petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 subject to bond, local sureties, movement restrictions, and non-entry into Sahebganj Police Station jurisdiction with limited meetings with IO.

Ajgar Hossain @ Akram Miah and Ors. Vs the State of West… — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 23.09.2021 AT JALPAIGURI

¶2

23.09.2021 Court No.01 Item No. 20 Partly Allowed Krishnendu

¶3

C.R.M. 557 of 2021

¶4

(Via Video Conference)

¶5

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ;

¶6

And

¶7

In Re : Ajgar Hossain @ Akram Miah & Ors.

¶8

Petitioners Mr. Sudip Guha For the Petitioners Mr. Abhijit Sarkar Ms. Namrata Das

¶9

For the State

¶10

Apprehending arrest in connection with Sahebganj Police Station

¶11

Case No. 578 of 2020 dated 27.12.2020 under sections 341/ 325/ 326/

¶12

307/ 427/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have filed

¶13

the present application.

¶14

On the prayer of Mr. Guha, learned advocate appearing for the

¶15

petitioners, the present application, so far as the petitioner no. 4,

¶16

namely, Bellal Hosain , is concerned, is dismissed as ‘ not pressed ’.

¶17

¶18

He submits that the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 have been falsely

¶19

implicated due to an existing political rivalry between the parties. No overt act has been attributed to them. The allegations are omnibus in nature and in view thereof, custodial interrogation of the petitioner

¶20

nos. 1, 2 and 3 is not necessary.

¶21

Mr. Sarkar, learned advocate appearing for the State, opposes the

¶22

prayer of the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 and draws our attention to

¶23

several documents in the case diary, including the medical reports.

¶24

We have perused the medical reports and the statements of the

¶25

witnesses, as recorded under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶26

Considering the nature of accusations and the existing political rivalry, prima facie, false implication of the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 cannot be totally ruled out. In view thereof, we are of the opinion that

¶27

custodial interrogation of the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. However, the movement of the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 needs to be restricted.

¶28

¶29

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner

¶30

nos. 1, 2 and 3, namely, Ajgar Hossain @ Akram Miah, Alimul Hoque

¶31

@ Rintu Miah and Auwal Hussain @ Auyal Hussain, shall be released

¶32

on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties

¶33

of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of

¶34

the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a

¶35

further condition that the petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3 shall not enter the

¶36

jurisdiction of Sahebganj Police Station, save and except for meeting

¶37

with the Investigating Officer of the case once a case on and from 29^th

¶38

September, 2021 until further orders. The petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3

¶39

shall also intimate the address, where they would be residing, to the

¶40

Investigating Officer immediately.

¶41

The application for anticipatory bail, being C.R.M. No. 557 of

¶42

2021, is, thus, disposed of.

¶43

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly

¶44

downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶45

(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J)

¶46

Ajgar Hossain @ Akram Miah and Ors. v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajgar Hossain @ Akram Miah and Ors. v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baganchra Ramakrishna Sarada Ashram Repd by Its President Vs Sudhamoy Basu & Ors.

Mrs. Usha Rathore & Ors. Vs Ravi Kant Jajodia & Ors.

M/S Signotron (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Nautica Hospitality Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Smt Aparupa Sahana Vs Smt Nirupa Sahana

Harekrishna Das & Ors. Vs Gokul Das & Anr.

Gobinda Chandra Nath & Anr. Vs Kamala Rani Nath