Disposed

Nurul HUDA Mondal v. Sahara Bibi

Calcutta HC10 Jun 2022CRR/97/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the criminal revision application arising from an enhancement of maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, deemed infructuous due to a pending Section 127 CrPC case by the petitioner, while vacationing an interim order and directing expedited hearing. Subject heading map: service-and-employment; writ-and-judicial-review; other.

What did the court decide?

Disposition of C.R.R. 97 of 2015; vacation of interim order dated 6.7.2015; direction to expedite hearing under Section 127 CrPC.

Nurul HUDA Mondal Vs Sahara Bibi — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

10.06.2022 S/L No.1 KS

¶2

C.R.R. 97 of 2015

¶3

Nurul Hudah Mondal

¶4

-Vs.-

¶5

Sahara Bibi

¶6

Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Husen Mustafi

¶7

…..For the Petitioner

¶8

Learned advocate for the revisionist/husband appears before the Court and submits that initially an order of maintenance was passed in favour of the petitioner/wife in M.R. Case No.206 (IV) of 2013 under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal procedure granting a monthly maintenance of Rs.2,500/- to the wife and Rs.2,000/- per month to the minor son, totaling to Rs.4,500/- per month.

¶9

The petitioner/wife preferred Criminal Motion No.78 of 2014 before the learned Sessions Judge, Nadia wherein by a judgment dated 21.11.2014 the maintenance was enhanced to Rs.7,000/- per month. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment the O.P./husband preferred a revision under Section 401/482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside of the impugned judgment dated 21.11.2014 passed by the Learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Motion No.78 of 2014.

¶10

Learned advocate submits that on the basis of the order passed by this Court on 06.07.2015 the revisionist is paying maintenance to the respondent/wife to the tune of Rs.4,500/-. Since a separate Misc. Case under

¶11

¶12

Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the wife/petitioner bearing Misc. Case No.173 of 2019, the present application for revision has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of.

¶13

None appears for the opposite party despite service of notice.

¶14

Considered the submissions made by learned advocate for the petitioner.

¶15

The revisional application has no utility at this stage.

¶16

Accordingly, C.R.R. 97 of 2015 is disposed of without affecting the case

¶17

on merits. Interim order dated 6.7.2015 stands vacated.

¶18

Learned Magistrate is directed to expedite the hearing in connection with Misc. Case No.173 of 2019 under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure preferably within a period of four months from the date of this order.

¶19

Let a copy of this order be sent to the Learned Sessions Judge, Nadia and also to Learned Judicial Magistrate, 3^rd Court, Krishnanagar for information.

¶20

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶21

Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

¶22

(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Nurul HUDA Mondal v. Sahara Bibi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nurul HUDA Mondal v. Sahara Bibi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Francis Chatterjee & Anr. Vs Anadi Chatterjee ( Dutta ) & Anr.

Dreamz Collection & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Soumen Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Chaitali Dutta Burman @ Chaitali Mukhopadhyay & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Asgar Ali Mallick Vs Hamedul Begum

Ranajay Kumar Sahu & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.