This single-judge order dismisses a criminal revision application under CrPC 397/401/482 for default due to the petitioners' absence and lack of diligence on consecutive dates, vacating any interim orders.
Revisional application dismissed for default; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.6.2022 S.D. 10.
C.R.R. 2859 of 2015
Ranjan Kumar Sahu & Anr. Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
The matter is listed today for submission of administrative report
and for hearing.
None appears for the petitioners.
Report submitted by the department is not satisfactory since it is absolutely silent regarding service of notice upon the parties.
Petitioners had filed this application under Section 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. challenging orders dated 16.5.2015 and 20.5.2015 passed in Complaint Case No. C.R. 270 of 2015 under Section 420/406/120B of the IPC.
On a perusal of the record, it appears that the petitioners are not diligent in taking steps in this case and are not appears on consecutive dates.
Under such circumstances, the revisional application is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let the copy of this order be sent to learned Judicial Magistrate, 4th Court, Siliguri for information.
( Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J. )
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional application should be allowed given the petitioners' failure to appear on consecutive dates.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ranjan Kumar Sahu & Anr.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Ananda Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
