From the above observation of the trial court, it is clear that though the entry in the marriage register regarding the payment of such cash amount and gold ornaments are questionable and suspicious but learned trial court came to the ultimate conclusion after considering the overall conduct of the opposite party. Now to remove aforesaid anomaly the marriage registrar was called in the dock and in his deposition he has proved original marriage register which he produced form his custody and marked as exhibit -8 and further stated that he issued the certified copy of the marriage certificate to the husband/petitioner herein but due to mistake in the husband’s copy, column no. 16 in exhibit “A”, the relevant content in respect of transaction is missing. He stated that in the examination in chief that father of the bride had given the said cash amount of Rs. 7,00,000/- and gold ornaments of 30 bhories to his son in law, as appearing in column no. 16 in exhibit 8, has been written erroneously. He should have written it that the said cash amount and gold ornaments were given by the father of the bride to the bride. In the cross examination, he admitted that when this mistake was detected, he did not make correction by putting signature in the original register nor did he take any step to make correction. Said marriage registrar further admitted ther are certain corrections and overwriting in column No. 16 after the words “sariyat samuho balabat thakibe” and
