The court dismissed a revisional application as infructuous due to a prior dismissal order dated 04.03.2020, also disposing of the connected civil application.
CO 4179 of 2019 and CAN 1 of 2022 were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.11.2022 List – D/L. Sl No.1. Mithun Ct.No.652.
IA No: CAN/1/2022 In CO 4179 of 2019
Sri Gopal Chandra Majhi & Anr. Vs. Sri Tarak Nath Banerjee & Ors.
Mr. Anuram Samanta, Adv.
…for the petitioners.
Mr. Subrata Bhattacharya, Adv.
…for the opposite parties.
Referring an order dated 04.03.2020, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.1 submits that Misc. Case No.7 of 2012 has already been dismissed and as such present revisional application has become infructuous.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner also submits that in view of the order passed dated 04.03.2020, present revisional application may be disposed of.
In view of the dismissal order passed by the Trial Court, let CO 4179 of 2019 is dismissed being infructuous. Accordingly, CAN 1 of 2022 is also dismissed.
The copy of the order dated 04.03.2020 be taken on record.
2
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J)
Sri Gopal Chandra Majhi & Anr.
Sri Tarak Nath Banerjee & Ors.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
