Dismissed
Sebina Begum v. MD Mehebub Sk
Calcutta HCCRR/4166/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court No.39 AJ C.R.R. 4166 of 2011 In the…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court No.39 AJ C.R.R. 4166 of 2011 In the…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.04.2022 Item No.33 Court No.39 AJ
C.R.R. 4166 of 2011
In the matter of : Sebina Begum. ….petitioner.
Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Ld. A.P.P. …for the State.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. The State is represented.
It appears that on earlier occasions also the petitioner was not represented.
The interim order was vacated vide Order dated 5th March, 2012.
The matter is pending since 2011 and the reason for which the present revisional application has been preferred might have become infructuous in the meantime. I have also reason to believe that the petitioner is not interested to proceed further with the revisional application.
Let C.R.R. 4166 of 2011 be dismissed for default.
( Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee J. )
Sebina Begum
The State
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court