The High Court disposed of a revisional application regarding CRR 3887 of 2012 as infructuous, with no substantive legal issue or outcome recorded.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 40 Item 31 Ali 28.7.2022
CRR 3887 of 2012
Smt. Soma Saha & Ors. Vs. Sonali Ghosh & Anr.
Mr. Debasis Kar
… for the petitioners.
Mr. M. K. De.
Mr. Soumya Banerjee
….for the Opposite Party no. 1.
Mr. Debasis Kar, learned Counsel appears on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the impugned order has become infructuous so the instant revision may be disposed of accordingly.
Mr. Banerjee, learned Counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 1 also submitted the same.
Under such circumstances, the revisional application has become infructuous and accordingly disposed of.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
Smt. Soma Saha & Ors.
Sonali Ghosh & Anr.
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
