Court dismissed a contempt application filed under CPA 46 of 2001 for default as no accommodation was sought and no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Contempt application dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
111 26.07.2022. ab Ct. 40
C.P.A.N. 46 of 2001
Protiva Debnath & Ors. Vs. Maya Majumdar In WPA 3066 of 2000 Protiva Debnath Vs. Union of India
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners on repeated calls.
No accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the contempt application is
dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
Protiva Debnath & Ors.
Maya Majumdar
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
