The High Court dismissed a revisional application for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioners, who had failed to appear on multiple previous dates as well.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.11.2022 70 cm
CRR 355 of 2014
Subhendu Mandal & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.
None appeared for the petitioners and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 7th November, 2022, 9th November, 2022 and 10th November, 2022. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. No accommodation is sought.
Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 355 of 2014 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Subhendu Mandal & Ors.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
