The High Court permitted a correction to an earlier order dated 4.11.2022, rectifying a typographical error in the case number from CRR 1870 of 2013 to CRR 1873 of 2013.
The order dated 4.11.2022 was corrected to read "CRR 1873 of 2013" instead of "CRR 1870 of 2013".
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.12.2022 3 SB Ct. No.33
CRR 1873 of 2013
In the matter of : Dibyendu Das
Mr. Pinak Mitra … for the petitioner
It appears that an inadvertent typographical error has crept into the order dated 4.11.2022.
In the second paragraph of the said order instead of “CRR
1870 of 2013”, it should actually be “CRR 1873 of 2013”.
The inadvertent typographical error is hereby corrected of the order dated 4.11.2022.
The other portion of the order shall remain unchanged.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Dibyendu Das
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
