Bapi Pramanik v. State of West Bengal &a Nr
Case brief
What is this about?
The revisional application was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear on multiple dates and did not seek accommodation for adjournment.
The revisional application was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not appear on multiple dates and did not seek accommodation for adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.11.2022 10 cm
CRR 3474 of 2013
Bapi Pramanik Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 21st November, 2022, 22nd November, 2022, 23rd November, 2022 and 24th November, 2022. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought.
Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 3474 of 2013 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Bapi Pramanik
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court