The court dismissed the revisional application CRR 2291 of 2013 for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner despite multiple dates of hearing. Any interim order stands vacated.
Revisional application CRR 2291 of 2013 dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.11.2022 9 cm
CRR 2291 of 2013
Tapan Ghosal Vs. Rabindranath Barui & Anr.
None appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought, when the matter was called on 21st November, 2022, 22nd November, 2022, 23rd November, 2022 and 24th November, 2022. Today also when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation is sought.
Accordingly, revisional application being CRR 2291 of 2013 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)
Tapan Ghosal
Rabindranath Barui
Ananya Bandyopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
