The court dismissed a revisional application with liberty to challenge a supplementary charge-sheet on the day it was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner.
Revisional application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the supplementary charge-sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06.6.2022 Court No.29 Sl. No. 2 SD
CRR 3242 of 2018 With CRAN 3 of 2019 (Old CRAN 4433 of 2019)
In the matter of: Navneet Singh Gogia
Mr. Sanjay Banerjee Ms. Nahid Ahmed
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Dhillon Sengupta Mr. Ayan Chakraborty
… for the Opposite Party No.2.
Mr. Sanjay Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as his instruction goes, the investigation has already been ended in charge-sheet with a further prayer to file supplementary charge-sheet.
In that view of the matter, the petitioner wants to withdraw this revisional application with liberty to challenge the charge-sheet filed by the investigating agency.
Mr. Dhillon Sengupta, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that he has no objection if the prayer made by the petitioner is allowed.
Accordingly, the revisional application along with connected application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the supplementary charge-sheet submitted by the investigating agency.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Navneet Singh Gogia
Opposite Party No.2
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
