Allowed

Shoaib Hossain v. State of West Bengal &Anr

Calcutta HC12 May 2022CRR/1780/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 509 IPC involving a neighbourhood dispute over water supply and cleanliness, subject to the petitioner furnishing a good behaviour bond.

What did the court decide?

The proceedings under Section 509 IPC corresponding to G.R. No. 2254 of 2014 are quashed, and the petitioner must furnish a Good Behaviour Bond under Section 111 CrPC before the Executive Magistrate b

Shoaib Hossain Vs State of West Bengal &Anr — Quashing and FIR | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

12.05.2022

¶2

Item No.11 Ct.No.34 dc.

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

¶4

C.R.R. 1780 of 2019

¶5

Shoaib Hossain

¶6

versus

¶7

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

¶8

In Re : An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed for quashing of proceedings being G.R. No. 2254 of 2014 pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah arising out of Entally Police Station Case No. 277 of 2014 dated 30.06.2014 under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharya, Mr. Priyankar Ganguly, Ms. Shalini Bairagi … For the Petitioner. Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Mr. Bitasok Banerjee … For the State. Md. Zeeshan Uddin, Ms. Amrin Khatoon … For the Opposite Party No.2.

¶10

This revisional application has been preferred challenging the proceedings arising out of Entally Police Station Case No. 277 of 2014 dated 30.06.2014 under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. No. 2254 of 2014.

¶11

The opposite party no.2 and the present petitioner who has been accused in connection with the said case at the instance of the opposite party no.2 are neighbours in a building. The disputes and differences cropped up and there are allegations of abuse hurled by the present petitioner against the opposite party no.2.

¶12

¶13

I find that the spirit of letter of complaint which was treated to be the first information report contains allegation of regular day-to-day activity which involves supply of water, keeping the area dirty and being adamant in continuing such illegal activities. The abuse, altercation arose out of basic necessities of life which relate to availability of water and cleanliness to be maintained at the locality. I also find that there are allegations of spitting at the door.

¶14

Having regard to the genesis of the dispute and the fact that the petitioner and the opposite party no.2 are neighbours, I am of the opinion that continuance of the proceedings under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code is unwarranted in view of the supporting statements which have been relied upon by the prosecution.

¶15

Accordingly, I am of the opinion that on certain conditions, the proceedings may be quashed. Thus, the proceedings arising out of Entally Police Station Case No. 277 of 2014 dated 30.06.2014 under Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. No. 2254 of 2014 are hereby quashed subject to the present petitioner furnishing a Good Behaviour Bond under the provisions of Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the jurisdictional Executive Magistrate for a period of one year from date. Such bond should be furnished before the learned Executive Magistrate by 20.05.2022.

¶16

Accordingly, the revisional application being CRR 1780 of 2019 is allowed on the conditions mentioned hereinabove.

¶17

¶18

Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

¶19

All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.

¶20

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶21

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

¶22

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

Shoaib Hossain v. State of West Bengal &Anr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shoaib Hossain v. State of West Bengal &Anr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rita Saha and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

The State of West Bengal Vs Jhunpuki Majhi & Ors.

Khokan Sahoo @ Shyamapada Sahoo Vs Nurul Hoda Mondal & Anr.

Monami Dari Halder Alias Manami Dari Vs Srimanta Halder

Subhodip Mondal Vs State of West Bengal

Raja Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal& Anr.