The Court dismissed a revisional application filed under Sections 401 and 482 Cr.P.C. seeking dispensation of attendance in a cheque bounce case. The application was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear after receiving a notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.6.2022 S.D. 06.
C.R.R. 3179 of 2014
Pankaj Kumar Bhanja Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
This is an application under Section 401 read with under Section
482 of the Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner assailing an order dated 22.7.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Haldia, Purba Medinipur in C.R. Case No. 69 of 2014 under Section 138 of the N.I. Act praying for dispensing his attendance under Section 205 of the Cr.P.C.
The petitioner has not appeared on consecutive dates. In compliance with the order dated 14.3.2022, administrative notice was issued and the same was duly served upon the petitioner and opposite party no. 2., but the petitioner has not appeared before this Court.
The report is kept with the record.
The revisional application is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of this order be sent to learned Judicial Magistrate, Haldia, Purba Medinipur for information.
( Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J. )
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner's application under Sections 401 and 482 Cr.P.C. to dispense with personal attendance.
Whether the revisional petition should be allowed or dismissed in the absence of the petitioner after due notice.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Pankaj Kumar Bhanja
The State of West Bengal
Ananda Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
