The court dismissed CRR 296 of 2010 for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner at both calls, and vacated any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
135 07.07.2022 Ct.21 AKG
CRR 296 of 2010
In Re: - An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
And
In the matter of: Saif Ali Shah
…. Petitioner
In the first call, no one appeared. In the second call also, none
appears.
Accordingly, CRR 296 of 2010 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Saif Ali Shah
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
