The writ petition filed by the petitioner for WPA 12926 of 2022 was dismissed as it was not pressed by the petitioner due to formal defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 06.07 Ct 2022 21 AGM
W.P.A. 12926 of 2022
Rohini Sen Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors
Mr. S. Dutta, Mr. Kushal Paul, Mr. Saptarshi Dutt, … For the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Gupta,
… For the respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
Mr. Suman Sengupta, Mr. Saikat Chowdhury,
… For the State.
Mr. R. N. Jhunjhunwala, Sr. Adv Mr. Debdutta Sen, … For the respondent No. 6.
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that due to some formal defects in the writ petition, the petitioner does not want to proceed with this writ petition.
Accordingly, WPA 12926 of 2022 is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition on self same cause of action.
( Kausik Chanda, J.)
Rohini Sen
The State of West Bengal
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
