Swapan Chandra Mahato & Ors. v. the State of W.B.
Case brief
What is this about?
CRR 252 of 2003 In the matter of : Swapan…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.1.2023 Item No.1 BR
CRR 252 of 2003
In the matter of : Swapan Chandra Mahato & Ors.
……petitioners Mr.Himanshu De, Sr. Advocate Mr. Navanil De,, Mr. Rajeshwar Chakraborty, Mr. Subhrajit Dey …. For the Petitioners
In paragraph 6 of the judgment it was recorded that petitioner No. 2 and 3 both have left the universe. On the basis of such submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, while as a matter of fact the petitioner no. 2 is dead, Petitioner No. 3 is alive.
Under such circumstances paragraph 6 requires correction to the effect ‘petitioner no.2 left the universe’. The correction may be incorporated in the judgment and server copy may be corrected accordingly.
In paragraph 11 of the second line ‘petitioner herein’ should be read as ‘petitioners herein’. The
correction may be incorporated in the judgment and server copy may be corrected accordingly.
( Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J. )
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Swapan Chandra Mahato & Ors.
Coram
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/252/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court