H.C. in Calcutta rejected the petition by Special Leave Appeal and Section 482 CrPC to quash cheating proceedings. The Court found no miscarriage of justice, stating the petition lacked merit and dismissed it.
Petition for quashing of proceedings dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.9.2022 19 SB Ct. No.236
CRR 1969 of 2005
In the matter of : Ranjan Mitra @ Devendra Singh
Mr. S. Dutta Mr. Abhra Mukherjee … for the petitioner.
The proceeding stemps under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking an order to quash the proceeding.
The brief fact is stated that the petitioner was arraigned in Jadavpur P.S. Case No. 104(3) of 2004 as an accused for allegedly committing an offence under Sections 420/406 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition was filed before the learned J.M. 7th Court, Alipore seeking an order of discharge. The learned Trial Court having considered the materials made available before him was pleased to reject the application.
I do not find anything in the impugned order to hold that the same is a manifestation of miscarriage of justice. The petition under consideration is devoid of merit and stands dismissed.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proceedings under Sections 420/406 IPC should be quashed in public interest?
Whether the impugned order resulted in a miscarriage of justice?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ranjan Mitra @ Devendra Singh
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
