Dismissed
Santinath Sarkar v. State
Calcutta HCCRR/2388/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ct.21 AKG CRR 2388 of 2005 In Re: - An…
What the court decided
AI extract
Ct.21 AKG CRR 2388 of 2005 In Re: - An…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
115 12.07.2022 Ct.21 AKG
CRR 2388 of 2005
In Re: - An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
And
In the matter of: Santinath Sarkar
…. Petitioner
Mr. Shoubhhik Mitter
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee, Ms. Jayashree Patra
…for the Opposite Party No. 2
Mr. Soubhik Mitter, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he tried to contact the petitioner by sending a letter by Speed Post. The postal articles have come back with the endorsement “deceased”.
Mr. Mitter further submits that the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner have not contacted him.
In that view of the matter, CRR 2388 of 2005 is dismissed as infructuous. Let the envelope containing the letter addressed to the petitioner be kept with the records.
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Santinath Sarkar
Opposite Party No. 2
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court