Petition CRR 1765 of 2009 was dismissed for default as the petitioners did not appear in the first or second call for arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
122 AGM
12.07.2022 CRR 1765 of 2009
Ct. No. 21 In the matter of:- Subrata Chakraborty & Anr …petitioners
No one appeared for the petitioners in the first call. In the second call also none appears for the petitioners.
Accordingly, CRR 1765 of 2009 is dismissed for default.
(Kausik Chanda, J. )
Subrata Chakraborty
Kausik Chanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
