C.R.R. No. 2304 of 2019 was disposed of wherein a revisional application was preferred for the expeditious disposal of a pending case. The Court directed the learned Magistrate to fix one date in every 45 days.
Directed the learned Magistrate to fix one date in every 45 days for the filing and conclude the case within a reasonable time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L 40 March 3, 2022 Bpg.
C.R.R. No.2304 of 2019
(Via Video Conference)
In Re: An application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
Sri Phatik Dutta & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Ms. Sudipa Biswas. …for the petitioners.
The revisional application was preferred for expeditious disposal of BGR Case No.2124 of 2010 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 5th Court, Alipore.
In view of the innocuous prayer advanced on behalf of the petitioners, I direct that if the present proceedings are yet to be disposed of, the learned Magistrate would at least fix one date in every 45 days for the purpose of the present litigation and take the same to its logical conclusion within a reasonable period of time.
With the aforesaid observations, CRR 2304 of 2019 is disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Magistrate is directed to expedite the disposal of the pending case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Phatik Dutta & Ors.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
