Disposed

Sambhu Shaw & Ors. v. State of West Bengal& Anr.

Calcutta HC9 Jun 2022CRR/2/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected a prayer to quash a criminal proceeding due to a missing case diary. It directed the court below to search for the diary or reconstruct the record within eight weeks, with an order to be passed within one year if original records remain unavailable.

What did the court decide?

Directing the court below to trace the case diary and reconstruct the record within eight weeks or dispose of the trial within one year.

Sambhu Shaw & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

09.6.2022 Court No.29 Sl. No. 4 SD

¶2

CRR 2 of 2020

¶3

In the matter of: Sambhu Shaw & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Anand Keshari Mr. Sekhar Mukherjee

¶5

…for the Petitioners.

¶6

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee Md. Anwar Hossain Ms. Sreyashee Biswas

¶7

… for the State.

¶8

Perused the report submitted by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24-Parganas dated March 17, 2020. It appears from the report that the case diary in connection with South Port Station Case No.350/89 dated 22.11.1989 under Sections 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to C.G.R. Case No.4024/1989 is missing since long.

¶9

The petitioners herein have prayed for a direction upon the court concerned for expeditious disposal and/or quashing the entire proceeding.

¶10

Mr. Anand Keshari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, has referred a decision in the case of Babul @ Babul Kar vs. State of West Bengal passed in CRR 1832 of 2004 dated May 3, 2005 and argued that if the prosecution is thoroughly negligent in the proceeding with the matter, then the proceeding can be quashed.

¶11

State is represented.

¶12

In view of earlier order passed by this court ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate South 24 Parganas, Alipore, submitted a report and relevant portion of the report is as follows:

¶13

“That, on scrutiny of the case record, it seems that the F.I.R. is lying in a torn condition, but the written complaint and the other necessary document/s, like the Charge Sheet along with the list of witnesses, the seizure list are all lying with the case record. Thus if the Case Diary is traced out, a copy of the F.I.R. may be collected from the case diary and the record can be reconstructed without any further hindrance. For this purpose all necessary steps to trace out the Case Diary is being conducted in the G.R.O. Section since the date 28.05.92 and directions in this regard have been given to the staffs of the G.R.O. Section already and is under process. The office of the Ld. J.M. 5^th Court is also being further searched for the purpose. All concerned have been intimated in this regard as well.

¶14

¶15

Therefore, Your Lordship, I humbly pray for further time so that the Case Diary may be traced out ultimately, and I shall take the first opportunity to lay the same for Your Lordship’s kind direction.

¶16

In view of aforesaid submission made by the Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate South 24 Parganas, Alipore, and also having regard to facts and circumstances of the case, ld. Judicial Magistrate 5^th Court, Alipore is directed to pass appropriate order and also to do the needful so that the lost record can be reconstructed at the earliest, if it remains untraceable for a period of eight weeks more from this order.

¶17

In the event the reconstruction is done in respect of concerned record due to non-availability of original record the Magistrate will take every endeavor to dispose of the pending proceeding being south port case no. 350/89 dated 22.11.1989 under section 324/34 of the Indian Penal Code, preferably within a period of one year hence, since the case is pending for a petty long time and the revisionists are suffering a lot for no fault of their own. CRR 2/2020 is accordingly disposed of with the abovementioned directions.

¶18

Let a copy of this order be send to Ld. J.M., 5^th Court, Alipore at once.

¶19

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Sambhu Shaw & Ors. v. State of West Bengal& Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sambhu Shaw & Ors. v. State of West Bengal& Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Sharma Vs State of West Bengal& Anr.

Indrani Chatterjee Vs Rupa Karpas & Anr.

Future Tradesolutions LLP Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Sarbajit Dutta Vs State of West Bengal

Robiul Jamadar Vs State of West Bengal and Another

Shilak Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.