The court dismissed CRAN 1 of 2022 as infructuous because the related criminal appeal was already disposed of by the appellate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 16.1.2023 sb
CRR 2621 of 2019 With CRAN 1 of 2022
In the matter of : Smt. Indrani Chatterjee
…….Petitioner
Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Mitra …for the petitioner Mr. Bivash Banerjee Mr. Rohit Prasad ….for the Opposite party
Re: CRAN 1 of 2022
In this application, the prayer has been sought for extending the time to deposit of 20% of the compensation amount before the trial court in terms of the order dated 8th June, 2022.
It is submitted that the appeal being Criminal appeal no. 12 of 2017 has already been disposed of vide order no. 24 dated 30th July, 2022 by the appellate court and as such the application has become infructuous.
In view of above, CRAN 1 of 2022 is dismissed as infructuous.
A copy of the order passed by the appellate court is taken on record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Smt. Indrani Chatterjee
Opposite party
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
