Piyali Banerjee v. Kalyani Banerjee
Case brief
What is this about?
C.R.R. No.1945 of 2018 (Via Video…
C.R.R. No.1945 of 2018 (Via Video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L3 C.R.R. No.1945 of 2018 February (Via Video Conference) 10, 2022 Bpg. In Re: An application under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
Piyali Banerjee Versus Kalyani Banerjee
Mr. Samrat Chowdhury, Ms. Ankita Maji. …for the petitioner.
Ms. Oindrila Ghosh. …for the opposite party.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits written instructions, wherein it has instructed for not proceeding with the revisional application.
Let the written instructions be kept with the record.
Accordingly, CRR 1945 of 2018 is dismissed as not
pressed.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Piyali Banerjee
Kalyani Banerjee
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court