IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.23…
Application dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to file fresh applications separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08.02.2022
Item No.23 Ct.No.34 dc.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
C.R.R. 3315 of 2019
(Via Video Conference)
Arun Kumar Singh
versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re : An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Mr. Arif Ali, Mr. S. Bhattacharjee … For the Petitioner.
Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Mr. Krishna Chandra Das, Mr. Safdar Azam … For the Opposite Party No.2.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to prefer separate revisional applications in respect of complaint case Nos. C/4628 of 2006, C/4629 of 2006 and C/3485 of 2006.
In view of the submissions so advanced and as has been pointed out by the learned advocate appearing for the opposite party no.2, the present revisional application in its form is not maintainable as three complaint cases have been challenged in a single revisional application.
Accordingly, CRR 3315 of 2019 is dismissed as not pressed with liberty granted to the petitioner to file revisional applications freshly in respect of each of the complaint cases.
Department is directed to hand over the certified copies relating to the complaint cases upon the same being replaced by photostat copies by the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner.
2
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Arun Kumar Singh
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
