Allowed

Mukesh Roy v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC16 Jun 2022CRM (DB)/1734/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench held that continued detention of an undertrial petitioner for over eight years due to slow trial progress violated Article 21. Bail was granted subject to territorial restriction in Chandannagore/Chandannagore jurisdiction and regular reporting to police officials.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of local surety and reporting to Jagaddal police station.

Mukesh Roy Vs State of West Bengal — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

16.06.2022 SL No.37 Saswata Ct.28 (Allowed)

¶2

CRM (DB) 1734 of 2022

¶3

In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Bhadreswar P.S. Case No. 100/2017 dated 16.03.2014 under Sections 3636/364/302/201 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

In the matter of: Mukesh Roy

¶5

And ….Petitioner

¶6

Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Soumen Ghosh …for the Petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh Mr. Bitasok Banerjee …for the State.

¶7

Petitioner is in custody for more than 8 years. Thre is very slow progress in the trial of the case.

¶8

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits one witness has been examined.

¶9

We have considered the materials on record. Allegation against the petitioner is grave. However, there is inordinate delay in progress of the trial which infracts fundamental right to speedy trial of the petitioner under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has not contributed to the delay in any manner.

¶10

In view of the aforesaid facts, we are of the opinion further detention of the petitioner, as an undertrial prisoner, would be unjustified and he may be granted bail.

¶11

The prayer for bail is, thus, allowed.

¶12

Let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 20,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned ACJM, Chandannagore, Hooghly subject to the condition that he shall appear before the learned trial court regularly on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever with further condition that

¶13

¶14

the petitioner while on bail shall not leave the jurisdiction of Jagaddal Police Station and report the Officer-in-charge of Jagaddal police station once in a week or until further orders.

¶15

In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without any further reference to this Court. The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.

¶16

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Mukesh Roy v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Roy v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anup Roy @ Ashok @ Ashok Da @ Susanta Majumdar Vs State of West Bengal

Sk Orion Ali Vs the State of West Bengal

Kalu Sk @ Kuran Vs State of West Bengal

Nasir Ali Mondal @ Nazir Khan Vs State of West Bengal

Akash Kumar Shaw@Akash Kr Shaw Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Md. Sohidul Karim Vs State of West Bengal