Single bench disposition regarding cancellation of anticipatory bail in a professional dispute. Court held no reason to cancel bail granted against an advocate. Case disposed accordingly.
Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed; bail order maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23 17.08.2022 wt 24 Court No.29 (AD)
C.R.M. 6799 of 2021
With C.R.M. 2726 of 2020
In Re.C.R.M. 6799 of 2021
In Re: - An application for cancellation of bail, under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. And In the matter of: - Pinku Kuili ...petitioner. Mr. Arindam Jana Mr. Saibal Acharya Mr. Subrata Santra … for the petitioner in CRM 6799 of 2021. Ms. Faria Hossain Mr. Anand Keshari … for the State in CRM 6799 of 2021. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Mr. Bitasok Banerjee … for the State in CRM 2726 of 2020. Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra Mr. Somnath Adhikary Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick … for the opposite party no.2 in CRM 6799 of 2021. Affidavit-in-reply filed in Court be taken on record. The opposite party no.2 surrendered before the jurisdictional Court.
The disputes are between two Advocates. We do not find any reason to cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the accused.
C.R.M. 6799 of 2021 is disposed of accordingly.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted in a dispute between two advocates should be cancelled due to nature of dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pinku Kuili
The State
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
