Allowed

Tarikul Mia v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC16 Aug 2022CRM (A)/3718/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An application for anticipatory bail was filed in connection with a case under the NDPS Act. The Court held that since no narcotics were recovered from the petitioner and the report lacked evidence of nexus with commercial quantities, the petitioner could overcome NDPS restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, subject to reporting to the Investigating Officer fortnightly and appearing in court.

Tarikul Mia Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

16.08.2022 Serial no. 04 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) Allowed )

¶2

CRM (A) 3718 of 2022

¶3

In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 750 of 2022 dated 15.07.2022 under Sections 21(C)/29 of the NDPS Act.

¶4

-And-

¶5

In the matter of : Tarikul Mia @ Mithun Sk

¶6

Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick, Advocate

¶7

… … For the Petitioner

¶8

Mr. T. D. Nandy,

¶9

Mr. Antarikhya Basu, Advocates … …For the State

¶10

Report as called for by the order dated August 3, 2022 filed in Court be taken on record.

¶11

No narcotic was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is sought to be proceeded against on the basis of the statement of the co-accused made while in custody.

¶12

The report dated August 11, 2022 does not speak of any nexus between the petitioner and the commercial quantity of narcotics and/or the accused arrested with the commercial quantity of narcotics.

¶13

In such circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner is able to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

¶14

Consequently, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶15

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

¶16

¶17

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶18

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed .

¶19

CRM (A) 3718 of 2022 is disposed of .

¶20

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶21

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Tarikul Mia v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarikul Mia v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Guria & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Khadem Sk @ Sekh Khadem Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mohammad Jakir Mondal and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Bhanu Paul Vs State of West Bengal

Najmul Molla and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Sovan Lal Ghosh @ Sovanlal Ghosh @ Shovon Ghosh @ Shobhan Lal Ghosh @ Shobhanlal Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal