Allowed

Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar Das v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC23 Aug 2022CRM (A)/3978/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted an application for anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a murder (IPC 302) case. The court noted that the post-mortem report indicated the victim's death was a suicide. Bail was granted subject to a bond, sureties, and conditions regarding reporting and court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000, two sureties, and standard reporting/appearance conditions.

Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar Das Vs State of West… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

C.R.M. (A) 3978 of 2022

¶2

23.08.2022 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Sl.8 the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Basirhat Court No.29 Police Station Case No. 228 of 2022 dated 19.04.2022 under (AD) Sections 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. (Allowed) And

¶3

In the matter of: Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar Das ….petitioner. Mr. Siddhartha Sarkar …for the petitioner. Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. APP Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya

¶4

…for the petitioner. …for the State.

¶5

Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

¶6

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

¶7

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the post-mortem report of the victim as also to the statements recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He submits that out of five FIR named accused, four were arrested.

¶8

The post-mortem report suggests that the death was due to the suicide committed by the victim. The police are investigating under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the petitioner.

¶9

In view of the post-mortem report of the victim, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶10

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of

¶11

¶12

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶13

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶14

C.R.M. (A) 3978 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.

¶15

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶16

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar Das v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Das @ Sanjay Kumar Das v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohosin Ali @ Mahasin Ali Sekh Vs State of West Bengal

Sefali Bibi Vs Anikul Alam Biswas @ Kharab and Anr.

Kumaresh Ghosh Vs State

Ashim Barman Vs State of West Bengal

Bahadur Mia Vs State of West Bengal

Rajat Das Vs State of West Bengal