The single-judge criminal revisional court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed by Bahadur Mia as not maintainable since the petitioner was already in custody following his arrest in connection with drug-related offences.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as not maintainable due to petitioner's arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 3 (AD) 23.08.2022 Court No.29 |
C.R.M. (A) 3892 of 2022 |
|---|---|
| (Dismissed as not maintainable) |
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Special Case No.143 of 2021 arising out ofKaliachakP.S. Case No.1419 of 2021dated20.12.2021under Sections21(c)/29of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and read with Section27Aof Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 arising out of GDE 687/2021. And |
| In the matter of: - Bahadur Mia ...petitioner. |
|
| Mr. Kalidas Saha …for the petitioner. Mr. Binay Panda Mr. Subham Bhakat …for the State. |
|
In view of the petitioner being arrested,C.R.M. (A) 3892 of 2022is dismissed as not maintainable. |
|
| State is represented. | |
| (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) |
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail is maintainable when the petitioner has already been arrested
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Bahadur Mia
The State
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
