Allowed

Debasis Mondal@Debasish Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC24 Aug 2022CRM(A)/377/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a Section 306 IPC case following a suicide-supported postmortem report. The court directs release upon furnishing a bond with two sureties and imposes conditions to appear before the court and reporting to the investigating officer.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; conditions for reporting and court appearance imposed.

Debasis Mondal@Debasish Mondal Vs State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

24.08.2022 Serial no. 01 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) Allowed )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

¶3

CRM (A) 377 of 2022

¶4

In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Maynaguri Police Station Case No. 200 of 2022 dated 26.05.2022 under Sections 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

-And-

¶6

In the matter of : Debasis Mondal @ Debasish Mondal

¶7

… … Petitioner

¶8

Mr. Snehansu Majumder,

¶9

Mr. Prabir Majumder., Advocates

¶10

… … For the Petitioner

¶11

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, ld. APP (Via video conference) Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee, (Via Video conference), Mr. Mr. Ujjwal Luksom, Advocates

¶12

… …For the State

¶13

Considering the postmortem report of the victim which suggests that the victim committed suicide and considering the materials in the case diary, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶14

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the

¶15

¶16

investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶17

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed . CRM (A) 377 of 2022 is disposed of .

¶18

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶19

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

Debasis Mondal@Debasish Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Debasis Mondal@Debasish Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashim Barman Vs State of West Bengal

Bahadur Mia Vs State of West Bengal

Rajat Das Vs State of West Bengal

Sekendar Khan Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

State of West Bengal Vs Rajat Chakraborty @ Rajot Kumar Chakraborty

Krishnapada Sahis Vs State of West Bengal