Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC filed by Soleman Biswas in connection withSections 302/341/34 IPC. Bail was denied due to the gravity of the offence and involvement found in case diary materials.
Application for anticipatory bail rejected and dismissed due to gravity of offence and case diary materials.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.03.2022 103 Ct. No 29 KAUSHIK (REJECTED)
C.R.M. (A) 201 of 2022
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 294 of 2021 dated 28.05.2021 under Sections 302/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In Re : Soleman Biswas ….. petitioner Mr. Anisur Rahaman .… for the petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli Mr. Arani Bhattacharya … for the State
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the incident arose out of disputes relating to plucking of mangoes.
Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary.
Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected and the application being CRM (A) 201 of 2022 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner considering the gravity of the offence and materials in the case diary.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Soleman Biswas
The State
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
