Allowed

Badal Kumar Maiti v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC29 Mar 2022CRM (A)/154/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail filed by Badal Kumar Maiti. The FIR was registered four months after the incident, and the victim died in an accident involving an unidentified vehicle. The Court rejected the accusation of false implication and granted bail subject to specific conditions, including meeting the investigation officer fortnightly and appearing in court daily fro

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to meeting the IO fortnightly and appearing daily in Court from a fixed date.

Badal Kumar Maiti Vs the State of West Bengal — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

29.03.2022 101 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed

¶2

C.R.M.(A) 154 of 2022

¶3

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Contai Police Station Case No. 119 of 2021 dated 01.04.2020 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶4

And

¶5

In Re : Badal Kumar Maiti ...… petitioner

¶6

Mr. Soumik Ganguly .…for the petitioner Mr. Ranabir Roychowdhury Mr. Mainak Gupta .…for the State

¶7

Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

¶8

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated. The police complaint was registered consequent upon an order passed under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and that too four months after the alleged incident. The victim died out of an accident with the vehicle not being identified.

¶9

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report of the victim.

¶10

In one of the injury report of the victim, it transpires that the victim confide in a motor cycle and was hit by a car, which was unknown to the victim.

¶11

¶12

The post mortem report of the victim corroborates that the death was by way of an accident.

¶13

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶14

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶15

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

¶16

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶17

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

¶18

Badal Kumar Maiti v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badal Kumar Maiti v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balai Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal

Swapan Kumar Dutta Vs State of West Bengal

Debjyoti Mondal Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mohidur Rahaman Vs State of West Bengal

Soleman Biswas Vs State of West Bengal

Gopal Tarafdar Vs State of West Bengal