The petitioner filed a contempt application for violation of a Writ order but did not appear at the hearing. The court dismissed the application for non-appearance, deeming the petitioner no longer interested, and directed tagging the files.
Contempt application dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ct. 28.9 No.
14 2022 10 akb (F.N.H.)
C.P.A.N. 855 of 2003 In
W.P. 1006 (W) of 2003 Amar Nath Shaw –VersusBiswajit Chatterjee & Anr.
( Main File Not In Court )
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time
of call.
This is a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed by the petitioner on 20th May, 2003.
The petitioner by filing the instant application, sought for punishment of the alleged contemnors for violation of the order dated 24th February, 2003 passed in W.P. 1006 (W) of 2003. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioner to press the application.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department.
( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Amar Nath Shaw
Biswajit Chatterjee & Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
