This order dismisses a contempt application (C.P.A.N. 1148 of 2000) filed in connection with C.O. 8287 of 1990 for default because no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated summons.
Contempt application dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
86 26.07.2022. C.P.A.N. 1148 of 2000 ab In Ct. 40
C.O. 8287 of 1990 Renuka Sarkar & Ors. Vs. Sweta Chandra
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners on
repeated calls.
No accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the contempt application is
dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to decide the contempt application on merits or dismiss for default due to non-appearance.
Renuka Sarkar & Ors.
Sweta Chandra
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
