In a contempt application filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the court dismissed the petition for non-appearance of the petitioners, concluding they were no longer interested in proceeding.
The contempt application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-09-2022 Item no.11
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.147 of 2001 Chandan Kr. Gayen & Ors. -vs-
Debasis Som & Ors.
arising out of WPA No.10034 of 1999
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on February 2, 2001, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated February 2, 2000 passed by this court in WP No.10034(W) of 1999.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Chandan Kr. Gayen & Ors.
Debasis Som & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
