Dismissing a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for the non-appearance of the petitioners and their failure to press the application after filing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-09-2022 Item no.11
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.1018 of 2000 Kamal Roy & Ors. -vsvMr. V. gujral & Ors. arising out of WPA No.7811 of 1999
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 dated June 12, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated October 7, 1999 passed by this court in WP No.7811(W) of 1999.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Kamal Roy & Ors.
Mr. V. gujral & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
