Disposed

Kaushik Bhattacharjee v. Chandrani Bhattacharjee

Calcutta HC17 Nov 2022CO/3027/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the revisional application seeking directions for the expeditious disposal of a pending alimony matter before the Additional District Judge. Pending disposal is directed to be ensured before May 2023.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Additional District Judge, Serampore, to ensure expeditious disposal of alimony matter before May 2023 without unnecessary adjournments.

Kaushik Bhattacharjee Vs Chandrani… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

17.11.2022 Item No.11 Ct. No.7 CHC (disposed of)

¶2

C.O.3027 of 2022

¶3

Shri Kaushik Bhattacharjee Vs.

¶4

Smt. Chandrani Bhattacharjee nee Chatterjee

¶5

Mr. Sanjib Mitra, Mrs. Sarbani Chakraborty

¶6

…for the petitioner

¶7

A direction to secure expeditious disposal of Mat. Suit No.3600 of 2017, pending before learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, at Serampore, is the ultimate relief sought for in this case.

¶8

The only contention expressed by the petitioner/husband is against delay caused in disposal of the suit.

¶9

As per submission disclosed by petitioner, that there is a Misc. Case No.61 of 2018 pertaining the alimony matter, which has not yet been disposed of.

¶10

No other point is raised requiring address by this Court.

¶11

In view of the nature of order proposed to be made in this case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary.

¶12

Service upon the opposite party stands dispensed with.

¶13

¶14

Accordingly, learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, at Serampore in Mat Suit No.3600 of 2017 is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of pending alimony matter vide Misc. Case No.61 of 2018, providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to either of the parties to this case, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable, preferably before the end of May, 2023.

¶15

The logical conclusion of the suit may be reached thereafter, subject to suitability and convenience of the court below, but without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties to this case.

¶16

With this observation/direction, the revisional application stands disposed of.

¶17

Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the opposite party and her learned advocate in the court below.

¶18

Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance of all necessary formalities.

¶19

(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)

Kaushik Bhattacharjee v. Chandrani Bhattacharjee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaushik Bhattacharjee v. Chandrani Bhattacharjee

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nasir Sekh and Ors. Vs Monbhul Sekh @ Samsul Hoque and Ors.

Sk Majnu Hossain and Another Vs Faridpur Jama Masjid Repd by Sk Abdul Hossain and Others

Sumitra Kumar Singh Vs Anila G. Ojha and Ors.

Pushpa Das Vs Swami Santananda@ Mangal Bhattacharjee and Ors.

Niyati Patar @ Patra and Ors. Vs Biswajit Singha and Ors.

Sushila Mishra and Anr. Vs Chandan Sahu and Anr.