Puspa Mondal & Anr. v. Tapas Ray Chowdhury
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bench clarified rates and periods for interest on arrear pension benefits. Petitioners are entitled to 9% per annum from November 1, 2010. The Treasury Officer, Kakdwip, must pay the interest within four weeks of communication of the order.
What did the court decide?
Order directs payment of arrear pension interest @ 9% p.a. from Nov 1, 2010. FIR discharged.
What the court decided
- 02-12-2021 debajyoti (Ct. no.06)
WPCRC 307 of 2019 in WPA 12935 of 2017 with IA NO:CAN/1/2017 (Old No:CAN/11335/2017)
Puspa Mondal & Anr. Vs.
Mr. Tapas Ray Chowdhury & Anr.
Mr. Tamal Taru Panda
… For the Petitioners.
By an order dated August 21, 2017, WP 12935(W) of 2017 was disposed of by directing the Treasury Officer, Kakdwip to pay interest to the petitioners @ 9% per annum on the amount released in favour of the petitioners by way of pensionary benefits on and from June 15, 1990 till the date of issuance of the Pension Payment Order.
Several appeals were preferred by the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance from several similar orders as above. A bunch of such appeals was disposed of by the Hon’ble Division Bench by an order dated March 24, 2021, clarifying that interest would be payable in such cases to the petitioners on the arrear pension from November 01, 2010 instead of June 15, 1990.
In view of the above, I dispose of this contempt application by clarifying that the petitioners shall be entitled to receive interest @ 9% per annum on arrear pension from November 01, 2010 till the date of issuance of the Pension Payment Order. The Treasury Officer, Kakdwip, shall pay such interest to the petitioners within four weeks from the date of
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the entitlement to interest on arrears of pension should be calculated from November 1, 2010 or June 15, 1990.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Puspa Mondal & Anr.
- respondent
Mr. Tapas Ray Chowdhury & Anr.
Coram
Arijit Banerjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPCRC/307/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court