An application petition was dismissed for default absence of the petitioner who failed to appear in two calls. The court noted no relief was sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CO 2223 of 2001 with IA NO:CAN/1/2000 (Old No:CAN/7053/2000) (not in the file) with CAN/3/2001 (Old No:CAN/7168/2001) (not in the file)
Smt. Madhu Bala Ruia
Vs. Sri Bishnu Pada Banerjee
In the first call, nobody appeared for the petitioner. In the second call also, nobody appears. No accommodation is sought for. This is a very old matter. It seems the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with this matter.
CO 2223 of 2001 along with CAN 7053 of 2000 and CAN 7168 of 2001 are dismissed for default.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
Smt. Madhu Bala Ruia
Sri Bishnu Pada Banerjee
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
