We do not see any ground for us to adjudicate on any of the issues raised hereinabove. The matter is entirely, within the domain of the State Government in view of the provisions of the Act and because the 6th respondent is holding office in terms of a decision of the Government as reflected through the Government notification. The only course that would remain for the petitioner is to seek that the State Government, through its competent authority, decides on a representation that the petitioner is stated to have been made before the State Government authorities. That representation is dated January 22, 2021. We are not persuaded to issue any order except to state that the State Government authorities will consider that representation dated January 22, 2021, taking into consideration the different submissions of the petitioner in that representation. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner persuasively requested that there may be an order to appoint an IAS Officer in lieu of the 6th respondent or to bring any other person as administrator under the Act, we are not impressed to issue any such order.
