The High Court dismissed the writ petition as abated due to the death of the petitioner without prejudice. The court issued no further orders.
The writ petition stands abated and is accordingly disposed of without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L Item No. 54 19.03.2021 AP/Kole
WPA 4377 of 2020
Sri Amitabha Majumdar -VsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Arunangshu Chakraborty,
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Jahar Lal De, Mrs. Debjani Mitra,
… for the State.
Mr. Jahar Lal De, learned Advocate, represents the
State.
Mr. Aranangshu Chakraborty, learned Advocate appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petitioner himself had passed away quite some time back.
In such view of the matter the present writ petition stands abated and accordingly disposed of without prejudice.
(Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, CJ.)
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)
Sri Amitabha Majumdar
The State of West Bengal
Ors.
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
Aniruddha Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
