Dismissed

Chintu Chanak and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC6 Jan 2021WPA/55/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner to submit offline applications for recruitment as Primary Teacher by extending the deadline to January 8, 2021, despite an original requirement of January 6, 2021, and directed the Board to consider these applications under Recruitment Rules, 2016.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was permitted to submit offline applications by January 8, 2021, extending the original deadline of January 6, 2021, and the Board was directed to consider their eligibility.

Chintu Chanak and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and… — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

127 06.01.2021. ab Ct. 15

¶2

WPA 55 of 2021

¶3

(Via Video Conference) Chintu Chanak & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Bikram Banerjee, … For the Petitioners. Mr. L.K. Gupta, Mr. Subir Sanyal, Mr. Ratul Biswas, …For the W.B.B.P.E.

¶5

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the notification dated 23^rd December, 2020 for recruitment process of Primary Teacher issued by the West Bengal Board of Primary Education is not sustainable in the eye of law as the petitioners should be awarded marks for attempting wrong questions/ options in the key answers of JGB question booklet series. Learned Counsel further submits that as an interim measure the notification dated 23^rd December, 2020 should be stayed.

¶6

Mr. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the West Bengal Board of Primary Education submits that the Board may allow the petitioners to submit applications offline pursuant to the notification dated 23^rd December, 2020 and such

¶7

¶8

applications may be duly considered during the recruitment process, provided they submit the applications within the time fixed in the said notification. Board shall be entitled to consider the eligibility of the petitioners as per the Recruitment Rules, 2016.

¶9

Heard both the parties.

¶10

In view of the above, I request the Secretary, West Bengal Board of Primary Education to allow the petitioners to submit applications offline pursuant to the notification dated 23^rd December, 2020 and such applications may be duly considered during the recruitment process, provided they submit their applications by 8^th January, 2021 though the notification specifies that the applications should be submitted by 6^th January, 2021 and this order will be confined only to the petitioners considering the fact that the petitioners have approached the Court within 6^th January, 2021. It is obvious that the Board is entitled to consider the eligibility of the petitioners as per the Recruitment Rules, 2016.

¶11

The writ petition is disposed of, however, no order as to costs.

¶12

Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have been

¶13

¶14

denied.

¶15

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

¶16

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)

Chintu Chanak and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chintu Chanak and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabir Mandal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Arpita Sarkar Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Samapti Layek Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Rahaman Mondal and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Dinabandhu Chanda and Another Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Susmita Sardar Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.