Disposed

Arun Chandra Mazumder & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Calcutta HC20 Dec 2021WPA/31385/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a PIL regarding low pay scales of West Bengal DSC primary teachers, an absent petition led the Court to dispose of the matter by directing the State to consider a pending departmental representation expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.1 to consider the petitioners' representation dated 24.11.2017 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

Arun Chandra Mazumder & Ors. Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

December 20, 2021 Item No.41 Court No.1 SG/s.biswas

¶2

WPA 31385 of 2017

¶3

Arun Chandra Mazumder and others

¶4

vs. The State of West Bengal and others

¶5

(Through Video Conference)

¶6

Mr. Anirban Ray, ld. Govt. Pleader Mr. Supratim Dhar, Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Advocates

¶7

… for the State

¶8

This public interest litigation is filed by the petitioners who are primary teachers in representative capacity raising the grievance that the current pay-scale of primary teachers in West Bengal under District Primary School Council are much lower than the payscale given to the similarly situated primary school teachers of many States other than the West Bengal and that of Madrasahs which are under the same education department of the State.

¶9

This petition was filed in the year 2017 and no one is present to prosecute the present petition.

¶10

Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the petitioners have already filed a detailed comprehensive representation dated 24.11.2017 to the respondent No.1, the Secretary, School Education Department and there is no objection in considering the representation of the petitioners.

¶11

Hence, without going into the merits of the matter, the present petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.1 to consider the petitioners’

¶12

¶13

WPA 31385 of 2017

¶14

representation dated 24.11.2017 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶15

Learned counsel for the State is directed to send a copy of this order along with a copy of the representation dated 24.11.2017 to the respondent No.1 without any delay.

¶16

Learned counsel for the State is further permitted to obtain a photocopy of the petition along with enclosures from the department at his own cost.

¶17

Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.

¶19

[Prakash Shrivastava, C.J.]

¶20

[Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.]

Arun Chandra Mazumder & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Chandra Mazumder & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

South Eastern Eailway Thika Sramik Union & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

South Eastern Railway Thika Sramik Union & Nar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Biplab Kr Chowdhury Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Khilkapur Byabosayee Kalyan Samity Vs Union of India & Ors.

Narayan Chandra Das & Ors. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Bramhapada Halder & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.