The High Court at Calcutta allowed the petitioners withdraw the writ petition (WPA 3014 of 2019) with liberty to file afresh.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.01.2021
ap
19 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 3014 of 2019
(Via Video Conference)
Bagalaprosad Pradhan & Ors.
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Advocate,
Mr. Sarbananda Sanyal, Advocate … For the petitioners.
Mr. Chandi Charan De, Addl. G.P.,
Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Subhasis Bandyopadhyay, Advocate,
Mr. Anirban Sarkar, Advocate
… For the State.
As prayed for by Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, learned counsel leave is granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
(Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J.)
Bagalaprosad Pradhan & Ors.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ashis Kumar Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
