The High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed due to the death of the petitioner's advocate-on-record and the filing of a subsequent petition.
None granted; WPA 1654 of 2020 stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23 20.01.2021 Court. No.38 b.das
WPA 1654 of 2020 (Via Video Conference)
Mangal Chandra Das & Ors. Vs.
The State of W.B. & Ors.
Mr. Soumitra Dasgupta Ms. Susmita Chowdhury
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Soumitra Bandopadhyay Mr. Subhasis Bandopadhyay …for the State.
In view of the death of the advocate-on-record engaged by the petitioner to whom this writ petition was filed, the petitioner has filed a subsequent writ petition being WPA 8750 of 2020.
Under the circumstances, WPA 1654 of 2020 stands dismissed as not pressed.
Urgent certified copy of this order be immediately made available to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J.)
Mangal Chandra Das & Ors.
The State of W.B. & Ors.
Ashis Kumar Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
