The petitioner, aggrieved by the cancellation of an errant LPG distributor, approached the court. The undertook that steps were taken against the distributor. Since there was no further grievance, the judge disposed of the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 22
11.02.2021 (DL 36) (S. Banerjee)
WPA 280 of 2021
Anup Kumar Saha Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Ors.
Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy Mr. Pingal Bhattacharyya Mr. Subhankar Das … for the petitioner Mr. Arunava Ghosh Mr. Puspendu Chakraborty Mr. Suman Dey
… for the IOCL
The step against the errant distributor of LPG has already been taken by the respondents.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that after such cancellation, he does not have any grievance to be ventilated before this court in this matter.
Therefore, the writ application is disposed of.
(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J.)
Anup Kumar Saha
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Abhijit Gangopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
